Regulation of prostaglandin receptors and P450c17 by PGE2 during ovine pregnancy and parturition

Rationale: Preterm birth (<37 weeks gestation), which affects women in both developed and underdeveloped countries, occurs in about 10% of all pregnancies and accounts for approximately 70% of neonatal mortality and morbidity.  Individuals born prematurely are at an increased risk of developing respiratory and neurological problems in early childhood that can continue into adulthood.  Preterm birth imparts significant emotional stress for the affected family members and treatment of preterm infants has a major financial impact on the health care community.  By understanding the endocrine events involved in labour onset, new strategies and/or medical technologies can be developed to identify new markers of preterm birth and to prevent its occurrence. 

Background: Prostaglandins (PGs), such as PGE2 and PGF, have been well described as important effectors in the onset of parturition where they are known to play a key role in cervical ripening, uterine contractility, membrane rupture, and in the endocrine pathway through stimulation via the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA axis).  PGs mediate these effects through specific G-protein coupled receptors - the EP receptors (subtypes1-4) for PGE2 and FP receptor for PGF.  Stimulation of contractile receptors (EP1, EP3, FP) results in Ca2+ mobilization and cAMP inhibition, in contrast to relaxatory receptors (EP2, EP4) that promote cAMP production.  Previous studies in sheep reported that fetal cortisol produced in late gestation is associated with increased placental PGHS-2 (a prostaglandin synthase) protein expression, and a subsequent increase in PGE2 synthesis. This rise in PGE2 induces placental P450c17, an enzyme that converts C21 steroids to C19 sex steroid precursors, resulting in altered placental steroid synthesis at term.  Also, we previously demonstrated that periconceptional undernutrition (UN) results in a precocious rise in fetal cortisol levels and subsequent increases in PG concentrations and estrogen synthesis, resulting in preterm delivery.  However, the mechanism by which PGE2 increases P450c17 is not understood.  

Objectives:  Using two different models, glucocorticoid-induced preterm labour and a periconceptional undernutrition model, we aim to investigate the role of PGs in altering placental steroid synthesis, in late pregnancy and parturition, by assessing whether PGE2 acts as an intermediary through which increased fetal cortisol levels result in increased P450c17 expression and to determine the expression, localization and regulation of PG receptors that modulate this effect.    

Hypothesis: We propose that in late pregnancy and labour, placental PGE2, acting through EP receptor subtypes 1-4, directly upregulates P450c17 in an autocrine/paracrine, and/or intracrine manner.  Differential regulation of the EP receptors in late gestation ovine placentomes might be affected by cortisol +/- meloxicam (PGHS-2 inhibitor) infusion and/or periconceptional UN.

Experimental design & methodology: A.) Glucocorticoid-induced preterm labour model: Late gestation (d120-125) pregnant ewes were chronically instrumented with maternal and fetal vascular catheters, amniotic fluid catheters, and uterine electromyogram (EMG) leads.  After ~5d recovery, ewes were randomly divided into 3 experimental groups: 1.) saline control (S; n=6); 2.) intra-fetal cortisol (C; n=4); 3.) intra-fetal cortisol + meloxicam (CM; n=5).  Animals were infused for an 80hr time period.  Uterine contractility (via EMG) and intrauterine pressure (IUP) were continuously recorded and blood gases were monitored daily to assess fetal and maternal health.  Blood samples were collected every 8 hrs beginning 24hrs prior to infusion start and over the 80hr time period.  At infusion end (~130d gestation; term=145d), ewes were anaesthetized and placentomes were rapidly dissected, frozen on dry ice and stored at 800C until analysis. Placental protein expression levels of PGHS-2, EP1-3 subtypes and FP were analyzed by Western blot with corresponding preabsorption controls.  Plasma concentrations of cortisol and PGE2 (fetal) and progesterone, estradiol, and 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F (PGFM; metabolite of PGF) (maternal) will be analyzed using radioimmunoassay (RIA) and ELISA.  B.) Periconceptional undernutrition model: Singleton-bearing Romney ewes were randomized to either control (ad libitum feed, N, n=7) or UN (n=10) from 60 days before conception until 30 days after, followed by maintenance feeds for the remainder of pregnancy in all ewes.  The UN regimen reduced maternal body weight by 15% and this recovered upon re-feeding.  At 131d gestation, ewes were euthanized and placentomes were rapidly dissected, frozen on dry ice and stored at -800C until analysis. Placental protein expression levels of EP1-4 subtypes were analyzed by Western blot with corresponding preabsorption controls.  Immunohistochemical localization of EP1-4 was performed using antigen retrieval.

Results: A.) At the end of 80hrs (~130d gestation), PGHS-2 protein expression was significantly increased in both C and CM groups versus S control (p < 0.05).  Protein levels of EP1-3 and FP protein in placentomes were unaltered by C or CM infusion.  (Note: EP4 protein expression and all plasma measurements have yet to be completed).  B.) At 131d gestation, EP1-4 protein was expressed in both N and UN placentomes and protein levels were similar between the two groups.  All EP receptor subtypes were localized to the fetal trophoblast layer and endothelium of blood vessels and were also localized to glandular epithelium in full membrane sections.  Distribution of EP1-4 receptor subtypes were similar between N and UN groups, consistent with the protein data.

Conclusions: A.) The expression pattern of EP1-3 subtypes in late gestation ovine placentomes suggests that PGE2, in late gestation, likely acts through EP receptors to regulate levels of P450c17.  We conclude that enhancement of PGE2, through increased PGHS-2 enzyme, rather than alteration in prostaglandin receptor subtype expression, is responsible for the established pattern of altered placental steroid biosynthesis and parturition in this species.  B.) The expression pattern of EP1-4 subtypes in N and UN placentomes suggests that PGE2, in late gestation, likely acts through EP receptors to regulate levels of P450c17.  Thus, EP receptors likely mediate this regulation in an autocrine/paracrine and/or intracrine manner.  Our data suggest that UN does not have a significant effect on the distribution and protein levels of EP receptors in ovine placentomes, consistent with previous studies from our lab demonstrating that UN did not affect placental P450c17 protein levels.


New knowledge gained and transdisciplinarity of research project:

With the recent birth of sextuplets in Vancouver, there has been much media coverage focused on reproductive technologies and premature birth.  A current CBC news article has highlighted the difficulties premature infants face when brought into the world "ahead of schedule".  Thus, the anticipated results of my research project will assist in understanding the mechanisms underlying term and preterm birth.  With the results that have been generated to date from my research, a better understanding of the placental endocrine axis of labour has been elucidated.  With this new knowledge, current tocolytic therapies can be modified or novel drugs and markers of preterm birth can be identified, which aim to improve the overall health and well-being of the mother and baby. 

Although my particular research project focuses on the basic sciences, it is important to address other transdisciplinary aspects with respect to preterm birth (PTB).  Economically, management of PTB comes at a significantly high cost to the health care system.  Caring for a premature infant can cost $1000-2000/day in hospital and particular tocolytic therapies may also prove to be costly depending on the individual case presented (i.e. administration of antenatal glucocorticosteroid treatment + tocolytic drug therapy).  Moreover, long-term follow-up studies are important in order to determine the potential effects of certain treatments on maternal health and fetal growth and development.  The social impact of PTB is also high as families are emotionally affected by having an infant who requires care in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).  Many parents and families who have had an infant in an NICU have experienced the sometimes day-to-day uncertainty of their child's health.  The time the infant is hospitalized not only brings about this large amount of stress, but some families might have to travel long distances in order to have their infant cared for in a tertiary care NICU.  Additionally, it can potentially bring financial burden to the family as both parents might have to cut back on the amount of time they spend working.  Continuing with another transdisciplinary theme, it is also important to recognize the ethical issues pertaining to preterm labour.  For example, the number of cases of multi-fetal pregnancies, which often result in PTB, continues to rise and many scientists and health care professionals cite that this is partly due to the increased use of IVF and other assisted reproductive technologies.  IVF and other infertility treatments continue to bring to light the issue of ethics.  Despite the fact that IVF is routinely used in infertility treatment, some individuals cannot draw a line between the patient and the research subject in these instances and, as a result, have a difficult time accepting them as routine clinical practice.  Additionally, there are some individuals who argue that it may not be in the best interest of the baby to prevent premature birth as the infant may initiate labour in order to remove itself from an adverse situation in utero.  Thus, overall it is important for health care professionals and researchers to consider all facets and complexities of PTB in order to optimize the health and well-being of the mother and infant.


Questions:

1. Although placental PGE2 levels increase in late gestation, why do we not see an upregulation in EP receptors? Can you suggest an underlying mechanism?

2. In your opinion, do you agree/disagree when it comes to preventing or delaying premature birth?  

Options d'affichage des commentaires

Sélectionnez la méthode d'affichage des commentaires que vous préférez, puis cliquez sur "Sauvegarder les paramètres" pour activer vos changements.

1. Perhaps EP receptor

1. Perhaps EP receptor upregulation does not occur in response to rising PGE2 levels due to a negative feedback mechanism, such as uncoupling of the receptors or decreased receptor sensitivity. This may serve a role in preventing preterm labour despite increasing prostaglandin levels toward term, and may provide evidence that the initiation of parturition is a multifactorial process.

2. I disagree that an attempt to stop preterm labour should be made in all cases. For example, if preterm labour is initiated by an infectious or inflammatory process, prolonging gestation may have deleterious consequences both for mother and fetus, including chorioamnionitis and systemic sepsis. In addition, there is some evidence to suggest that rising fetal cortisol levels in response to physiological stressors (pre-eclampsia, placental dysfunction, IUGR) may initiate preterm labour. In such cases, tocolysis may not be beneficial to the fetus beyond providing time to administer corticosteroids if appropriate.

Excellent project and very thought-provoking questions!

Genevieve

Hi Genevieve, Thank you very

Hi Genevieve,

Thank you very much for your kind words and positive comments regarding my project! I really appreciate it.

In response to the comments you posted:

1. I have also been speculating that there could be a negative feedback mechanism occurring with EP receptor expression in late gestation. Interestingly, an abstract presented at the 2006 Scientific Meeting for the Society for Gynecologic Investigation from Dr. David Olson's group in Edmonton reported a significant decrease in FP receptor mRNA levels in a dose-dependent manner after treatment with PGF2α using cultured human myometrial cells. A similar event could also be happening in the placenta with respect to EP receptor expression, particularly near term, in order to control sex steroid biosynthesis and consequently prevent preterm labour.

2. I agree that the decision to use tocolytics to help delay or prevent PTB should be made on an individual basis. Currently, there are different classes of tocolytics and dependent upon the symptoms the mother presents with, the right treatment should be made to benefit the health of both mother and fetus. Yes, I agree that infection such as chorioamnionitis could prove to be harmful if the fetus remains in utero for a prolonged period of time. Also, in other instances such as severe pre-eclampsia, it is best to not delay PTB as it could be highly dangerous to both the mother and fetus' health and well-being.

Thanks again for your comments.

Hi! I find this project

Hi! I find this project pretty interesting. Here are some comments:

Transdisciplinarity:

Potential consequences of PTB are enumerated, but I do not see the transdisciplinarity in this project. According to STIRRHS’s definition, "A transdisciplinary approach involves sensitivity to the fact that multiple disciplines must contribute to research on complex reproductive health problems; […] and an effort to go beyond sharing perspectives, knowledge and ways of doing to finally share a common language." Did other discipline knowledge have been use/involve in order to explain the phenomenon studied?

Ex. The research resume gives me the impression that PTB was all about the endocrine events. What are the primary causes of preterm birth? To my understanding, endocrine events are responses to something, part of chain reaction. If UN could have been a root cause of PTB – PGE2, as I understood, is acting under the influence of the fetal cortisol: how can this be influence? Could ‘primary/root’ causes of PTB be certain lifestyle and environmental factors such as smoking, drinking alcohol, using drugs, exposure medication diethylstilbestrol (DES), domestic violence (physical, sexual or emotional abuse), stress, infections, diabetes, etc. ? Then, would it be useful to also focus on the primary causes in order to prevent PTB?

2. In your opinion, do you agree/disagree when it comes to preventing or delaying premature birth?

Research suggests that many PTB cases are triggered by the body’s natural response to certain infections. In such situation, delaying is most probably not in patient’s interest... However, I have read that in nearly half of all cases, PTB ‘primary/root’ causes cannot be determined. To my point of view, it seems risky to control endocrine events in order to prevent/delay labour in cases where we don’t know if the foetus is trying to remove itself from an adverse situation. Is there any estimation of the % of PTB that could be (safely) prevent, among the 10% overall? Is there any aims formulated?

Good luck !
Sophie

Hi Sophie, Thank you for

Hi Sophie,

Thank you for your well wishes and comments on my research project.

Re: transdisciplinarity

I appreciate your comment regarding the transdisciplinarity of my research project. My particular project is focused on the basic sciences, more specifically the endocrine events that occur in late gestation and labour. However, as a student and STIRRHS trainee, I believe it is important that we address other transdisciplinary themes (i.e. ethics, socio-economic, etc) and attempt to incorporate these into our work. Therefore, while my project is focused on the physiological events of preterm birth, I am able to address these other themes in the rationale of my study in order to provide a contextual framework for my research. At the MSc level, it is difficult to include multiple disciplines into the methodology and plan of analysis without losing clarity and focus. However, having said this, I believe that having an understanding of not only the physiological determinants of preterm birth but also the social, economical, and ethical aspects helps put the significance of my project into context.

With regards to your next questions, preterm birth (PTB) is a complex and multi-factorial problem in maternal-fetal medicine and parturition requires coordinated interplay between the mother and fetus. There are a number of causes associated with it such as infection (~30-40%of all cases), multi-fetal pregnancies, maternal complications (preeclampsia), fetal distress, and ~50% are idiopathic. Understandably, the endocrine axis is not the sole contributor to preterm labour. Mechanical stretch of the uterus is also required to activate labour, in addition to the aforementioned. (If you are interested in reading more about the physiological regulation of parturition, I would recommend a review by Challis et al. 21(5):514 published in 2000 in Endocrine Reviews. It's lengthy but it gives an in-depth overview of the physiological events involved in labour onset). Going back to your comments, you are correct in noting that an individual's lifestyle may be a cause of preterm birth (i.e. stress, smoking). Our periconceptional UN model can be seen as a reflection of maternal dieting behaviour using a sheep model. In fact, our lab is currently investigating maternal dieting behaviour and the risk of delivering prematurely in a cohort of women in Southampton, England (the Southampton Women's Study/SWS). Other studies conducted in our lab have looked into PTB mechanisms in both infectious (chorioamnionitis) and preeclamptic tissues. So it is important and necessary to study the underlying mechanisms of other causes of PTB in order to gain more information which could help us identify new markers of PTB and/or uncover causes once deemed idiopathic.

Due to the fact that preterm birth is ~50% idiopathic, I agree that we must treat each case on an individual basis. Some drugs have shown harmful side-effects such as β-mimetics which cause maternal cardiovascular changes. Also, repeated administration of glucocorticosteroids can cause fetal growth restriction. Thus, it is imperative each patient is treated separately from every other patient in order to be given optimal treatment. With respect to your final questions, I do not know what the statistics are for the number of preterm deliveries that are 'safely' delayed/prevented in Canada or other countries that use tocolytic therapy in clinical practice. However, I believe that each country and maybe each province, state, or region would have their own formulations and strategic aims for the management of preterm birth which address, first and foremost, maternal and fetal health and well-being as well as the ratio of benefits:risks for particular therapeutic strategies and outcomes.

Pretty interesting! Nice

Pretty interesting! Nice effort to integrate a transdisciplinary aspect in your research project.

Your reflection is an example of the type of preoccupation a researcher should have regarding her or his research project. Becoming preoccupied by other aspects of what we are doing is a basic condition for the beginning of transdisciplinary thinking and eventually transdisciplinary analysis. In the summary you presented in this J Club, you are showing your preoccupation; it seems to me that it is for the moment rather theoretical. The question is how will you implement or actualized the transdisciplinary dimension of your research project (I know, you are at the master level)? How will you exploit it? In the discussion of your papers? In the discussion of your thesis? By writing an independent article on this?

The rational of your study is human prematurity. Up to what point the ewe is an adequate model for studying human reproduction? A sub-question: How much easy will it be to translate your data to the medical practice?

This is a really good start! Good luck for the future.

Hi Dr. Lambert, Thank you

Hi Dr. Lambert,

Thank you very much for your kind words.

Being a STIRRHS trainee, I have learned a lot about what transdisciplinarity in research is and how to start thinking on a more 'global' scale with respect to complex issues in the reproductive health sciences. But I know that this training is vital to many other disciplines of research and for that I am proud to have had this incredible learning opportunity. The seminar in transdisciplinarity last June in Montreal was a fantastic experience and the hands-on learning we received there has broadened my perspective in how to approach research. With respect to implementing a transdisciplinary perspective into my research, I will be able to discuss it when setting up the context for my research in papers and in describing the rationale in my thesis. However, I will likely be able to address it more thoroughly in an independent article.

Use of the sheep as an experimental model for pregnancy allows for in vivo manipulation, not possible in human subjects. Sheep demonstrate many similarities to humans concerning the endocrine and mechanical pathways that culminate in the initiation of labour. The advantages to using sheep versus other animal models is that sheep have a longer gestational period and pregnant ewes can tolerate invasive surgeries in which in utero functional tests can be conducted. Also, our current knowledge of fetal physiology is greatest in the sheep model versus other animal models used in pregnancy and parturition studies (i.e. mouse, rat, guinea pig).

Translating the results from my research into clinical practice still requires time and verification in human culture studies. In fact, Dr. Elif Unlugedik, a recent graduate from our lab and a STIRRHS trainee, completed her project looking at PG receptor expression in human placenta and fetal membranes. I will not go into the details of her study; however, with our complimentary research projects, interpreting our results into medical knowledge and practice may be more feasible.

Thank you very much again for your positive comments. I greatly appreciate the encouragement and look forward to applying the new knowledge I've gained in my future endeavours!

Hi Michelle, It seems that

Hi Michelle, It seems that your are involved in a big project. Preterm labour is a as you stated an important problem that needs a solution. Although some cases the preterm labour is the best option in most of the others the cause is not known and is so early that is life threatening for the baby. Of course is only acceptable to prevent preterm birth if the health of the mother is not at risk.

I have some questions about your project:

In the sheep when is preterm gestational age considered? when you end your experiment at 130d is just around the day considered preterm labour? Is the level of cortisol that you administer enough to start labour?

Why do you inhibit PGHS-2 with meloxicam? What did you expect in those experimental animals? Just a drop in PGs (is it only PGE2 that is supposed to decreae or also PGF2a?) so you would be able to see if PGs are regulating the expression of the receptors?

If you plan to see the effect of PGs on P450c17 levels why didn't you measure its levels ?

In your conclusion you mention that the UN did not have P450c17 protein levels affected. Is not that contradicting your introduction where you stated that fetal cortisol produced in late gestation is associated with increased placental PGHS-2, increase in PGE2 and that this increase in PGE2 induces P450c17. Or is it that UN has increased levels of PGs but controls the rise in P450c17?

You ask for a mechanism of why the receptors don't change even if PGs cahnge : Their expression must be regulated independently by different factors.

It a very interesting project and I am looking forward to continue this dscussion, congratulations,

Pia